Skip to main content

Kurundkar on Savarkar

 Article Link: Here

    Citizens of this country have many motives. Character-assassination of great sons and daughters of India for gaining an edge in Vote-bank politics is not a new trend. Specifically, the communists, because they can't run businesses, can't enlighten the society by mixing therein, can't forge organizations based on Harmoniousness, and run a pan-India party for decades without getting split, entrench in mud-slinging to sway the un-studied.

    In recent times, mud-slinging on Tilak, Savarkar, and Ramdas has become proof of one becoming an "intellectual". It is considered a fait-accompli to question Savarkar's mercy petitions, Tilak’s politics of Castes, and whether Ramdas was really a guru of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

    On the other hand, those who idolize the above three, have displayed a lot of foolishness. Expounding the greatness of these three in measured and powerful words is not a feat easily available to the subscribers of Hindutva. It is not that these three have not committed any mistakes.

    But it has become a crime to hold someone in high esteem and criticize them at the same time.

    The pseudo-liberals have ordained that Tilak, Savarkar, and Ramdas are not to be held in high esteem and the Hindutva-people have created an atmosphere where one can not criticize these three. On the other hand, to become a true-blue liberal, one must not criticize Gandhi, Nehru, Ambedkar, Shahu or Phule and to become a true Hindutvite, you must atleast keep ignoring the five above.

    A real intellectual like Narhar Kurundkar, who was (almost) free from such vices, has word-sketched the characters of eminent persons in quite a balanced manner, while criticizing and holding the person in high-esteem.

    Kurundkar’s article on Savarkar is quite known in Marathi readers. For the non-Marathi readers, it is being translated here.

    Kurundkar, though a Socialist, coming from Marathwada, could not ignore the excesses of Islamist ideology. Therefore, he would not dishonour Savarkar’s Hindutva, either by fear or by ignorance. Even though he could not be called a devotee of Savarkar, he has evaluated Savarkar, in quite appropriate manner. Therefore I am recommending the article to everyone.

Article by: Narhar Kurundkar, included in book “Anvay”

Translation: Ved Gumaste

Editorial Assistance for translation: Nachiket Nitsure  

Article Link: Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

कुरुंदकरांचे सावरकर - Kurundkar on Savarkar

या देशातील विविध नागरिकांना विविध प्रकारचे हेतू असतात. सत्तास्पर्धेसाठी महापुरुषांच्या चारित्र्याचे हनन करणे हा उद्योग हा नवीन नाही. विशेषत: कम्युनिस्टांना हा सोडून कोणताच उद्योग करता येत नसल्याने, अथवा समाजात जाऊन उत्तम प्रबोधन करता येत नसल्याने, त्यासाठी वात्सल्यावर आधारलेल्या संघटना उभारता येत नसल्याने, व अखिल भारतीय एकसंध एकच पक्ष अनेक दशके चालवता येत नसल्याने, ते अभ्यास न करणाऱ्यांना बहकवण्यासाठी अधूनमधून इकडेतिकडे डांबरफेक करतात. गेल्या काही काळामध्ये सावरकर, टिळक आणि रामदास अशा तिघांचे चारित्र्यहनन करणे हा तुम्ही "विचारवंत" असल्याचा पुरावा मानला जाऊ लागला. त्यामुळे सावरकरांची माफी, टिळकांचा जातिभेद आणि रामदासांचे गुरू नसणे यावर राळ उडवणे हे भूषण मानले जाऊ लागले. दुसरीकडे या तिघांचे भक्तही तितकेच अविचारी निघू लागले. या तिघांचेही अनन्यसाधारण महत्त्व मोजक्या प्रभावी आणि तेजस्वी शब्दात सांगणे हे अनेक हिंदुत्ववाद्यांना जमत नाही. या तिघांच्याही आयुष्यात अजिबात चुका नाहीत असे नाही. चिकित्सा करूनही एखाद्या माणसाला वंदनीय मानणे, हा जणू आजच्या काळात गुन्हा झाला आहे. सावरकर, टिळक